Replies: 3 comments
-
I'll let @aaronchongth respond to the specific questions about FreeFleet. Thanks for the suggestion of a public project board. Indeed, it is hard to predict timelines, particularly in an R&D context where we are juggling long-range design/development with short-range somewhat unpredictable demo crunches. Just like any R&D project; it's nothing unusual. In terms of "what we're working on," we have attempted to split the roadmap here into "things under active development" and "wish list items:" https://osrf.github.io/ros2multirobotbook/roadmap.html But of course it takes effort to maintain such lists and keep them up-to-date. Obviously there is a balance to be achieved between "spending all our time communicating" and "spending all our time writing code." There is a happy middle ground in there somewhere. We will look into Github Projects. Thanks for this suggestion. Some sort of public multi-repo board could be great. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello @Achllle !
For now, it will still be
The
The current free fleet server in The The current priority is to implement a fleet adapter using the
For the Let me know if you have any other questions! We'll try our best to make sure documentation and our roadmaps are up-to-date. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Following up on this, we're currently migrating to use GitHub Projects for all of our open source project management. The new project board can be found here: https://github.com/orgs/open-rmf/projects/3. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I see that there are a lot of changes underway to free_fleet. Some of those changes happen too fast to be worthwile updating the multirobotbook for, so it's hard for someone to understand where things stand, e.g.:
master
vsdevelop
vs some other branch?Zooming out to make a follow-on point: These questions are specific to free fleet, but I have several similar questions for the other repos. Some of these questions pertain to a roadmap, and I realize it's hard to predict timelines, but it would be good to see what on the roadmap is a wishlist vs 'we're working on this right now'. There are several ways to communicate that, but I wanted to pitch the use of Github Projects. We started using it over at the NASA-JPL Open Source Rover repo and it's a quite effective WAY to communicate status on things outwards (and internally). The roadmap in the book would then be higher level and require fewer PRs to keep up-to-date.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions