cargo test failing checks with insta

[AucaCoyan]

Hi! First time with insta, I heard it before, but I've never used. So when I did

cargo test

I obtained failing tests

Expression: evaluate_example(path)
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
-old snapshot
+new results
────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
    0     0 │ 0: Variable (4 to 5)
    1     1 │ 1: Int (8 to 11)
    2     2 │ 2: Let { variable_name: NodeId(0), ty: None, initializer: NodeId(1), is_mutable: false } (0 to 11)
    3       │-3: Variable (16 to 18)
    4       │-4: LessThan (19 to 20)
    5       │-5: Int (21 to 24)
    6       │-6: BinaryOp { lhs: NodeId(3), op: NodeId(4), rhs: NodeId(5) } (16 to 24)
    7       │-7: Int (31 to 32)
    8       │-8: Block(BlockId(0)) (25 to 34)
    9       │-9: Int (46 to 47)
   10       │-10: Block(BlockId(1)) (40 to 49)
   11       │-11: If { condition: NodeId(6), then_block: NodeId(8), else_expression: Some(NodeId(10)) } (13 to 49)
          3 │+3: Variable (18 to 20)
          4 │+4: LessThan (21 to 22)
          5 │+5: Int (23 to 26)
          6 │+6: BinaryOp { lhs: NodeId(3), op: NodeId(4), rhs: NodeId(5) } (18 to 26)
          7 │+7: Int (34 to 35)
          8 │+8: Block(BlockId(0)) (27 to 38)
          9 │+9: Int (51 to 52)
         10 │+10: Block(BlockId(1)) (44 to 55)
         11 │+11: If { condition: NodeId(6), then_block: NodeId(8), else_expression: Some(NodeId(10)) } (15 to 55)
   12    12 │ 12: Block(BlockId(2)) (0 to 0)

[AucaCoyan]

Some googling later I found that there is an issue with cargo test in the crate of cargo insta.
To test the crate, you need to

cargo insta test

I filed an issue, answered myself and close it so others can solve the problem quickly 🙌🏼
Have a great day!