Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Sessionhost disks are deployed with Readonly caching #744

Closed
d875167 opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 3 comments
Closed

Sessionhost disks are deployed with Readonly caching #744

d875167 opened this issue Feb 13, 2025 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@d875167
Copy link

d875167 commented Feb 13, 2025

Describe the feature end to end, including deployment scenario details under which the feature would occur.

I wonder why the sessionhost disks are deployed with ReadOnly host caching instead of ReadWrite?
Is it possible to change the default or add a parameter to control this?

Why is this feature important. Describe why this would be important for your organization and others. Would this impact similar orgs in the same way?

When deploying a W11 multi-session VM in the portal hostcaching is set to ReadWrite by default.

Please provide the correlation id associated with your error or bug.

xxxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxxxxxxxxxx

Can you describe any alternatives that you have taken since this feature does not exist?

No response

Feature Implementation

@d875167 d875167 added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 13, 2025
@danycontre
Copy link
Collaborator

@d875167 thanks for you feedback, we are reviewing it.

@danycontre
Copy link
Collaborator

danycontre commented Feb 20, 2025

@d875167 improvement pushed as part of PR #749, thank you for catching this one and reporting it.

@swathibhat1

@swathibhat1
Copy link
Contributor

swathibhat1 commented Feb 20, 2025 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants