refactor(JSONObject): extend JSONObject.Delete() to delete multiple entries

[jskelin]

This PR brings small improvement which enables deleting multiple entries at once.
Instead current

object.Delete("key1")
object.Delete("key2")

it is possible to:

object.Delete("key1", "key2")

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
12.5% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

Unit Test Results

1 825 tests  +5   1 824 ✅ +5   53s ⏱️ ±0s
  132 suites ±0       1 💤 ±0 
    1 files   ±0       0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit ae2a9cf. ± Comparison against base commit a088dab.

[Laubi]

I am not sure why you changed this here to json.RawMessage.
Without this change, I would've approved the PR immediately, as it's straightforward enough.

Since json.RawMessage is also not a type alias but a real type, I am really not sure if we should introduce it everywhere 🤔

[arthurpitman]

I agree - is there a need for this change? I believe the reason for json.RawMessage is be able to implement Marshaler and Unmarshaler.

[jskelin]

The usage of json.RawMessage emphasizes that the input should be JSON.

Could you explain the problems that defining an argument as json.RawMessage causes?

[arthurpitman]

Overall this is stylistic:

• The current version,

  r.Delete(bucketName)
  r.Delete(status)
  r.Delete(version)
  r.Delete(updatable)
  

  is easier to read.

• The proposed version r.Delete(bucketName, status, version, updatable) is less verbose.