We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Can you provide an example of canonical seqcol object representation when sequences are not provided, as in F4.
Do you leave off the sequences entry or do you digest the empty string or other?
sequences
@rob-p
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ok, I'll add that. basically you just don't include the sequences attribute at all. (no digested empty string)
Sorry, something went wrong.
add example of seqcol without sequences. Fix #73
154da6f
I added an example to the spec:
{ "lengths": [ "1216", "970", "1788" ], "names": [ "A", "B", "C" ] }
No branches or pull requests
Can you provide an example of canonical seqcol object representation when sequences are not provided, as in F4.
Do you leave off the
sequences
entry or do you digest the empty string or other?@rob-p
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: