Use if-let chains

[ghost]

Per Issue #195, I have gone through and added some if-let chains instead of pattern matching. Would appreciate any feedback you may have. Thanks!

[codecov-io]

Codecov Report

Merging #295 into master will decrease coverage by 10.2%.
The diff coverage is 73.17%.

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #295       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   80.17%   69.96%   -10.21%     
===========================================
  Files          11       11               
  Lines        3541     3533        -8     
  Branches      871      870        -1     
===========================================
- Hits         2839     2472      -367     
- Misses        355      357        +2     
- Partials      347      704      +357

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
src/parser.rs	62% <ø> (-17.45%)	⬇️
src/path_rewriting.rs	70.1% <0%> (-15.04%)	⬇️
src/lib.rs	63.4% <100%> (-9.66%)	⬇️
src/gcov.rs	70.21% <33.33%> (-10.64%)	⬇️
src/producer.rs	86% <76.19%> (-5.46%)	⬇️
src/output.rs	69.72% <77.77%> (-6.54%)	⬇️
... and 6 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c005222...dca1e9a. Read the comment docs.

[marco-c]

Thanks, it looks good overall!

[marco-c]

Thanks!

[ghost]

Any thoughts on why the codecov was so shot by these changes? I didn't really look into the tests, should I dig into that a bit?

[marco-c]

Any thoughts on why the codecov was so shot by these changes? I didn't really look into the tests, should I dig into that a bit?

No, no worries, I think it's just imprecise. We have to fix it somehow.

[ghost]

Any thoughts on why the codecov was so shot by these changes? I didn't really look into the tests, should I dig into that a bit?

No, no worries, I think it's just imprecise. We have to fix it somehow.

Great, thanks!