Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deeply normalize and extract registered outlives for implied bound hacks #137398

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Feb 21, 2025
@@ -202,7 +202,17 @@ pub fn compute_implied_outlives_bounds_compat_inner<'tcx>(
}
}

let pred = match obligation.predicate.kind().no_bound_vars() {
let pred = if ocx.infcx.next_trait_solver() {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

r=me, however, do you think it would be cleaner to always use wf::obligations_unnormalized and just use deeply_normalize in both solvers?

That way we shouldn't need the above ocx.register_obligation(obligation.clone());

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

bevy implied bounds hack no longer works
3 participants