Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Separate out Yarn major updates into separate Dependabot groups #1607

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 23, 2024

Conversation

esimkowitz
Copy link
Member

@esimkowitz esimkowitz commented Dec 23, 2024

This is annoyingly verbose, but will let us still get PRs for minor and patch updates separately from major updates, so we can continue to benefit from bugfixes without having to adopt breaking changes.

Also adds a jotai update group

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces comprehensive modifications to the .github/dependabot.yml configuration file, focusing on enhancing dependency update management. The changes involve creating multiple new dependency update groups for various ecosystems, including development and production dependencies.

The configuration now includes granular groups for dependencies like Storybook, Electron, Docusaurus, React, and Jotai, with separate groups for major, minor, and patch updates. These groups allow for more precise control over how and when dependencies are updated, with specific exclusion patterns for certain packages.

The modifications provide a structured approach to managing dependency updates, enabling more refined dependency tracking and update strategies across different technology ecosystems within the project. The new configuration allows for more targeted and controlled dependency maintenance.


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@esimkowitz esimkowitz merged commit 5cfbdca into main Dec 23, 2024
4 of 7 checks passed
@esimkowitz esimkowitz deleted the evan/dependabot-major branch December 23, 2024 18:00
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
.github/dependabot.yml (2)

97-107: Consider including related Jotai packages

The current pattern only matches the core "jotai" package. Consider if you need to include related packages like jotai-devtools or other Jotai ecosystem packages.

           jotai:
               patterns:
                   - "jotai"
+                  - "jotai-*"

Line range hint 1-107: Consider standardizing update schedules across groups

While the current configuration successfully separates major updates, you might want to consider adding explicit schedule configurations for each group. This would allow you to:

  • Run major updates less frequently than minor/patch updates
  • Stagger updates across different days to spread out the review workload
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 53a64fc and b3a5e34.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/dependabot.yml (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (6)
.github/dependabot.yml (6)

16-28: LGTM! Dev dependencies are properly separated

The configuration correctly splits development dependencies into two groups:

  • Regular updates (minor + patch) with appropriate exclusions
  • Major updates with matching exclusions

34-46: LGTM! Production dependencies are properly separated

The configuration correctly splits production dependencies into two groups with consistent exclusions and proper update type separation.


83-96: LGTM! React configuration is well-structured

The React configuration is precise and comprehensive:

  • Correctly includes both React runtime and type definitions
  • Properly separates major updates from minor/patch updates

62-70: Verify Electron package pattern coverage

The wildcard pattern *electron* might be too broad. Let's verify the actual packages it will match.

✅ Verification successful

Electron package pattern is appropriate

The pattern *electron* correctly matches only Electron-related packages:

  • @types/electron
  • electron
  • electron-builder
  • electron-updater
  • electron-vite

All matched packages are legitimately part of the Electron ecosystem, and there are no unintended matches. The wildcard pattern is working as intended for this specific use case.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check what packages would be matched by the Electron pattern

# List all dependencies that match the Electron pattern
echo "Matching packages in package.json:"
jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[] | select(test("electron"; "i"))' package.json 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 248


47-58: Verify Storybook package pattern coverage

The wildcard pattern *storybook* might be too broad. Let's verify the actual packages it will match.

✅ Verification successful

Pattern *storybook* correctly matches all Storybook-related packages

The pattern matches exactly what it should - all Storybook core packages, addons, and related utilities:

  • Core: storybook, @storybook/react, @storybook/react-vite
  • Addons: @storybook/addon-essentials, @storybook/addon-interactions, @storybook/addon-links
  • UI/Theming: @storybook/blocks, @storybook/theming, storybook-dark-mode
  • Tools: @storybook/builder-vite, @storybook/test, @chromatic-com/storybook

The wildcard pattern is appropriate and doesn't risk catching unintended packages.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check what packages would be matched by the Storybook pattern

# List all dependencies that match the Storybook pattern
echo "Matching packages in package.json:"
jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[] | select(test("storybook"; "i"))' package.json 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 428


74-82: Verify Docusaurus package pattern coverage

The wildcard pattern *docusaurus* might be too broad. Let's verify the actual packages it will match.

✅ Verification successful

The Docusaurus package pattern is appropriate

The wildcard pattern *docusaurus* in the dependabot configuration is well-suited for this codebase. The scan reveals that all matched packages are legitimate Docusaurus-related dependencies, all following the @docusaurus/* pattern (with one exception being @waveterm/docusaurus-og which is still Docusaurus-related). The pattern effectively covers all current Docusaurus packages without matching any unrelated dependencies.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check what packages would be matched by the Docusaurus pattern

# List all dependencies that match the Docusaurus pattern
echo "Matching packages in package.json:"
jq -r '.dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[] | select(test("docusaurus"; "i"))' package.json 2>/dev/null || true

Length of output: 177


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there are any package.json files in the repository
echo "Finding all package.json files:"
fd package.json

# For each found package.json, check for docusaurus dependencies
echo -e "\nChecking each package.json for docusaurus packages:"
fd package.json --exec sh -c 'echo "\n=== $1 ==="; cat "$1" | jq -r ".dependencies + .devDependencies | keys[] | select(test(\"docusaurus\"; \"i\")) // empty" 2>/dev/null' sh {}

Length of output: 761

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant