Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix issue #1625 #1702

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

fix issue #1625 #1702

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

ZLATAN628
Copy link

Created a global map cache for each block’s timeout event to address issue #1625.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 10, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the layoutModelHooks.ts file in the frontend layout library. The modifications focus on improving the management of layout models and debounced updates for node inner rectangles. A new timeoutMap is implemented to track timeout references for NodeModel instances, replacing the previous local state-based approach.

A utility function computeIfAbsent is added to simplify map operations, allowing for more concise retrieval or creation of map entries. The getLayoutModelForTab function is refactored to use this new utility function, reducing nested conditional checks. The setInnerRectDebounced function is updated to store timeouts directly in timeoutMap, and the clearInnerRectDebounce function is modified to clear timeouts from timeoutMap.

These changes streamline the code's structure and improve the management of layout-related state and timeout handling.


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b217275 and 9c454a0.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/layout/lib/layoutModelHooks.ts (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • frontend/layout/lib/layoutModelHooks.ts

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0d7439e and b217275.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • frontend/layout/lib/layoutModelHooks.ts (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
frontend/layout/lib/layoutModelHooks.ts (2)

20-25: Clean refactoring using computeIfAbsent!

The refactoring improves code readability while maintaining the same functionality and proper error handling.


14-14: Consider memory management for the global timeoutMap.

The global timeoutMap could potentially lead to memory leaks if timeouts aren't properly cleaned up when components unmount or when blocks are deleted. Consider adding cleanup logic to remove stale entries.

Let's verify if there are any block deletion or cleanup events that should clear the timeouts:

Comment on lines 76 to 81
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
},
[animationTimeS]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Update dependency array for setInnerRectDebounced.

The callback depends on clearInnerRectDebounce and nodeModel.blockId but they're not included in the dependency array.

Add missing dependencies:

-        [animationTimeS]
+        [animationTimeS, clearInnerRectDebounce, nodeModel.blockId]
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
},
[animationTimeS]
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
},
[animationTimeS, clearInnerRectDebounce, nodeModel.blockId]

Comment on lines 76 to 79
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix incorrect usage of computeIfAbsent for timeouts.

The current implementation won't update existing timeouts because computeIfAbsent only sets the value if the key doesn't exist. This could lead to stale timeouts.

Replace with direct map setting:

-            computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
+            timeoutMap.set(nodeModel.blockId, timeout);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
computeIfAbsent(timeoutMap, nodeModel.blockId, (_) => timeout)
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
setInnerRect(nodeInnerRect);
}, animationTimeS * 1000);
timeoutMap.set(nodeModel.blockId, timeout);

Comment on lines +83 to +91
const clearInnerRectDebounce = function () {
if (timeoutMap.has(nodeModel.blockId)) {
const innerRectDebounceTimeout = timeoutMap.get(nodeModel.blockId);
if (innerRectDebounceTimeout) {
clearTimeout(innerRectDebounceTimeout);
}
timeoutMap.delete(nodeModel.blockId);
}
}, [innerRectDebounceTimeout]);
};
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Add cleanup on component unmount.

The timeout needs to be cleared when the component unmounts to prevent memory leaks and potential state updates on unmounted components.

Add a cleanup effect:

+    useEffect(() => {
+        return () => clearInnerRectDebounce();
+    }, []);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Comment on lines 105 to 111
function computeIfAbsent<V, F>(map: Map<V, F>, key: V, mappingFunction: (a: V) => F): F {
if (!map.has(key)) {
const newValue = mappingFunction(key);
map.set(key, newValue);
}
return map.get(key);
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Improve type safety and documentation of computeIfAbsent.

The utility function needs improvements in type safety and documentation:

  1. The return type should handle undefined values from Map.get()
  2. Missing JSDoc documentation

Apply these improvements:

+/**
+ * Returns the value associated with the key if it exists in the map,
+ * otherwise computes a new value using the mapping function, stores it, and returns it.
+ * @param map - The map to check/update
+ * @param key - The key to look up
+ * @param mappingFunction - Function to compute the value if not present
+ * @throws Error if the computed value is undefined
+ */
-function computeIfAbsent<V, F>(map: Map<V, F>, key: V, mappingFunction: (a: V) => F): F {
+function computeIfAbsent<V, F>(map: Map<V, F>, key: V, mappingFunction: (a: V) => F): F {
     if (!map.has(key)) {
         const newValue = mappingFunction(key);
+        if (newValue === undefined) {
+            throw new Error(`Mapping function returned undefined for key: ${key}`);
+        }
         map.set(key, newValue);
     }
-    return map.get(key);
+    return map.get(key)!;
}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
function computeIfAbsent<V, F>(map: Map<V, F>, key: V, mappingFunction: (a: V) => F): F {
if (!map.has(key)) {
const newValue = mappingFunction(key);
map.set(key, newValue);
}
return map.get(key);
}
/**
* Returns the value associated with the key if it exists in the map,
* otherwise computes a new value using the mapping function, stores it, and returns it.
* @param map - The map to check/update
* @param key - The key to look up
* @param mappingFunction - Function to compute the value if not present
* @throws Error if the computed value is undefined
*/
function computeIfAbsent<V, F>(map: Map<V, F>, key: V, mappingFunction: (a: V) => F): F {
if (!map.has(key)) {
const newValue = mappingFunction(key);
if (newValue === undefined) {
throw new Error(`Mapping function returned undefined for key: ${key}`);
}
map.set(key, newValue);
}
return map.get(key)!;
}

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants